<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nehalem Supports Triple-Channel DDR3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.warepin.com/nehalem-supports-triple-channel-ddr3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.warepin.com/nehalem-supports-triple-channel-ddr3/</link>
	<description>Computer Hardware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 17:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apple Rumors, Brand New!</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/nehalem-supports-triple-channel-ddr3/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Rumors, Brand New!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/nehalem-supports-triple-channel-ddr3/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>[...] more, the 28-inch version I mentioned above could use Intel&#039;s X58 chipset, working together with a Nehalem-based processor, although details are quite sketchy at this time.  These being said, I think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more, the 28-inch version I mentioned above could use Intel&#8217;s X58 chipset, working together with a Nehalem-based processor, although details are quite sketchy at this time.  These being said, I think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Nehalem Delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/nehalem-supports-triple-channel-ddr3/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Nehalem Delayed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/nehalem-supports-triple-channel-ddr3/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>[...] known about it already, like the fact that it may be faster than expected, will have support for triple channel DDR3, and - that&#039;s no good news for AMD, but it was expected - sooner or later, Intel&#039;s Nehalem will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] known about it already, like the fact that it may be faster than expected, will have support for triple channel DDR3, and &#8211; that&#8217;s no good news for AMD, but it was expected &#8211; sooner or later, Intel&#8217;s Nehalem will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

