<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 512GB SSDs by 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/</link>
	<description>Computer Hardware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but don&#039;t SSDs have an issue with limited write cycles? I don&#039;t want to spend almost $1000 on a drive that I&#039;ll have to replace every 1-2 years just because it&#039;s a little faster than a regular HDD. If you really want the speed so badly, why not just go with a 10k RPM SATA drive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but don&#8217;t SSDs have an issue with limited write cycles? I don&#8217;t want to spend almost $1000 on a drive that I&#8217;ll have to replace every 1-2 years just because it&#8217;s a little faster than a regular HDD. If you really want the speed so badly, why not just go with a 10k RPM SATA drive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>To the first comment:  By the look of those connectors I reckon that&#039;s a SATA drive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the first comment:  By the look of those connectors I reckon that&#8217;s a SATA drive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/#comment-505</guid>
		<description>I agree with TurboFull, having two hard drives, one SSD and one regular HD would be the best solution - if used on a desktop computer only. Why? Because that basically means that mainstream laptops will never be the size of a MBA or smaller. 

Imagine the possibilities of a high-capacity SSD on a cellphone. That would be awesome, and it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if phones with multi-terabyte hard drives appear within the next 5-10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with TurboFull, having two hard drives, one SSD and one regular HD would be the best solution &#8211; if used on a desktop computer only. Why? Because that basically means that mainstream laptops will never be the size of a MBA or smaller. </p>
<p>Imagine the possibilities of a high-capacity SSD on a cellphone. That would be awesome, and it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if phones with multi-terabyte hard drives appear within the next 5-10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serenity</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>serenity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Very nice, but regular HDDs will survive for quite a while. By that time, a 1.5TB HDD will probably cost about $150 - and I really doubt the 512GB SSD will be any less than, what, $850?

SSDs are the future, when it comes to speed. For raw storage, magnetic media is far from dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, but regular HDDs will survive for quite a while. By that time, a 1.5TB HDD will probably cost about $150 &#8211; and I really doubt the 512GB SSD will be any less than, what, $850?</p>
<p>SSDs are the future, when it comes to speed. For raw storage, magnetic media is far from dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the king</title>
		<link>http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>the king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warepin.com/512gb-ssds-by-2009/#comment-491</guid>
		<description>this is pretty cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is pretty cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
